Jump to content

‘’Dragons old and young, true and false, bright and dark.''


Liaraeyne

Recommended Posts

Old: Aemon, Bloodraven


Young: Dany, Jon, Aegon


True: Dany, Jon, Aegon, Aemon


False: Quentyn, Viserys, Brown Ben, Cersie/Jaime(They pretended they were like Targaryens to justify incest)


Bright: Aemon (Bright could also mean wise/smart), Quentyn (He was pretty bright when he got lit on fire), Viserion/ Rhaegal


Dark: Drogon, Brown Ben



That's assuming that dragons refers to Targaryen blood. It could just as easily refer to Targaryen supporters, which would significantly increase the choices for each.



Or he could just be completely wrong. Melisandre showed that it's pretty easy to misinterpret things.


Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is an open thread about Moqorro's vision and here is the Brightfyre thread.

I think

Old Dragon - Aemon

Young Dragon - Jon

True Dragon - Dany

False Dragon - fAegon

Bright Dragon - Varys Brightflame

Dark Dragon - Illyrio Blackfyre

I think it is a good picture.

I don't see Illyrio as a dragon, though. He's from Braavos and that piece of info seems to be accurate.

The dark dragon could be Bloodraven, I guess.

Thanks for the links. :)

The vision is quite cryptic, so there's room for speculation.

This is just another idea:

old + true + bright

Varys, if he is a descendant of Aerion Targaryen. Brightflame.

young + false + dark

fAegon Targaryen, if he is a Blackfyre.

And you. A small man with a big shadow, snarling in the midst of it all.

Tyrion was in the middle of them on board the Shy Maid.

Just a little before he got on board the Selaesori Qhoran.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All I can say is that I don't think one person is limited to one descriptor (e.g. Jon can both young and true) or that each descriptor is limited to one person (e.g. Jon and Dany can both be young).

And it wouldn't surprise me if "bright" is a callback to Brightflame and the Brightfyre theory is true.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is possible that the descriptions maybe describing Targaryens (old, true, bright) and Blackfyres (new, false, dark). Tyrion has met some in the past and will meet up with others in the future.



If it refers to people then it sounds like Moqorro is taking the same set of dragons and just sorting them in multiple ways.


Link to comment
Share on other sites

I suppose it's very well possible that he is talking about two dragons; Dany and fAegon. It would explain the way the sentence is structured. If Moqorro meant 6 dragons, he would've said this: dragons old, young, true, false, dark and bright. Instead he is grouping opposite adjectives together. And Tyrion is snarling in the middle of fAegon and Dany. He has never met Bloodraven and he didn't have much to do with Aemon, and their meeting was years ago...



Dany = true, old (old blood) and bright (dragons, and does good things such as abolishing slavery).


fAegon = false (Blackfyre), young (Blackfyre is a relatively young house) and dark (Blackfyre sigil has black dragon, and fAegon is being used by Varys and maybe Illyrio for a cause that could be malicious).


Link to comment
Share on other sites

I suppose it's very well possible that he is talking about two dragons; Dany and fAegon. It would explain the way the sentence is structured. If Moqorro meant 6 dragons, he would've said this: dragons old, young, true, false, dark and bright. Instead he is grouping opposite adjectives together. And Tyrion is snarling in the middle of fAegon and Dany. He has never met Bloodraven and he didn't have much to do with Aemon, and their meeting was years ago...

Dany = true, old (old blood) and bright (dragons, and does good things such as abolishing slavery).

fAegon = false (Blackfyre), young (Blackfyre is a relatively young house) and dark (Blackfyre sigil has black dragon, and fAegon is being used by Varys and maybe Illyrio for a cause that could be malicious).

Now we are three!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I see two different methods of analyzing it.



There could be:



a old dragon


a young dragon


a true dragon


a false dragon


a bright dragon


a darl dragon



or



a old, true, and bright dragon


a young, false and dark dragon



I have no clue who is who, but I think the latter is the case, so we will have two dragons by the end.


Link to comment
Share on other sites

^A good summerization. If it is the second possibility I'm going for Dany and fAegon. Not Bloodraven. Bloodraven is by no means young.



If it's the first possibility I'm going for Aemon, Jon, Dany, fAegon, ? (maybe Quentyn, he was aflame which is bright), Bloodraven/Darkstar. [in ^that order]



Remember guys, the House of the Undying had a foreshadowing that Aegon is fake [''a cloth dragon standing in front of a cheering crowd'']. So it's likely that fAegon is the false dragon.


Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...