TheRaggedWildling Posted June 3, 2013 Share Posted June 3, 2013 Oh God, New England would be screwed... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arch-MaesterPhilip Posted June 3, 2013 Share Posted June 3, 2013 I would love a breakup of the US not, just the South, but a Republic of Cascadia with Washington Oregon and California would be quite a nice country to live in I feel and if by some miracle such an act of secession came up for a vote I would definitely vote for it.I think British Columbia would fit nicely into that too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sci-2 Posted June 3, 2013 Share Posted June 3, 2013 The more I think about the whole North vs South nonsense the more it seems like a pissing contest unworthy of anyone who thinks of themselves as American, regardless of them being Yankee, Southerner, etc.Both those who want to treat the South as ignorant racists and those who want to secede when elections don't go their way are acting childish. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Progressive Posted June 3, 2013 Share Posted June 3, 2013 I agree that is quite childish .... what I don't get is how often such secession fantasy manifest itself here from the usual culprits who are still hung up on the american civil war. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shryke Posted June 3, 2013 Share Posted June 3, 2013 I don't see why BC would want to hang out with a bunch of Americans. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Marquis de Leech Posted June 3, 2013 Share Posted June 3, 2013 I don't see why BC would want to hang out with a bunch of Americans.Surely a break-up of North America is Canada's big chance to dump Alberta? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shryke Posted June 3, 2013 Share Posted June 3, 2013 Surely a break-up of North America is Canada's big chance to dump Alberta?Eh, they aren't all bad. They certainly aren't American. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seli Posted June 3, 2013 Share Posted June 3, 2013 Oh God, New England would be screwed...Why? It would be a bit sad for the few republican strongholds up there in the short run, but there probably would be a re-alignment anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Former Lord of Winterfell Posted June 3, 2013 Share Posted June 3, 2013 Secession obviously isn't going to happen. But I do think it isThe more I think about the whole North vs South nonsense the more it seems like a pissing contest unworthy of anyone who thinks of themselves as American, regardless of them being Yankee, Southerner, etc.The North v. South thing doesn't work because its too much of an oversimplification. There really isn't any way to do any kind of secession, period.But I do think there is a truly significant divide between different visions for the country that will not be bridged by any politician, and if there was a way we could go our separate ways, I'd be all for it. It's just not possible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cuellar Posted June 3, 2013 Share Posted June 3, 2013 California would be fine on its own, probably Texas as well. You would all be paying higher gas and cable prices, that's for sure! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tzanth Posted June 4, 2013 Share Posted June 4, 2013 I'm all for California going its own way. If they want, Oregon, Washington, and BC would be welcome to join us. :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King.In.Yellow Posted June 4, 2013 Share Posted June 4, 2013 Secession is always good. As the first step towards a government-free society, I fully support the secession of every region from every state everywhere, for any or no reason in particular. Free Tibet, Palestine, Ulster, Dixie, Quebec, Scotland, Basque etc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sad King Billy Posted June 4, 2013 Share Posted June 4, 2013 does this desire for secede come from the same philosophy that lies at the core of extensive gerrymandering strategies? Dump the regions where your preferred politics and policies don't find a solid base so that one can push through their own agenda unopposed? Is there a more acceptable interpretation possible? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ser Scot A Ellison Posted June 4, 2013 Author Share Posted June 4, 2013 SKB,That does seem to track. Just remember the author in this case is from up North and is arguing in favor of letting the South leave because the South, in his opinion, is a terrible place with terrible people. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
awesome possum Posted June 4, 2013 Share Posted June 4, 2013 Meh, if we let the south secede we'd just end up spending billions more in foreign aid because those new "countries" would be going belly up faster than a farmer's ammonia tanks get stolen to make meth. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tormund Ukrainesbane Posted June 4, 2013 Share Posted June 4, 2013 http://vickimartinez.com/regions_copy[1].jpgI could live with this Although I think Utah and Colorado belong in the Red Country. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Former Lord of Winterfell Posted June 4, 2013 Share Posted June 4, 2013 SKB,That does seem to track. Just remember the author in this case is from up North and is arguing in favor of letting the South leave because the South, in his opinion, is a terrible place with terrible people.Well, the consensus here is that Republicans are terrible people, and Republicans/Republican leaning voters are at 45% or so. The South is just a euphemism for people who hold opinions he finds odious. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quoth Posted June 4, 2013 Share Posted June 4, 2013 :lol: Oddly, I'm in the middle of reading this book right now. I'd thought to post a thread, wondering what Scott's take on it would be. Once again, I'm late to the party. ;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TrackerNeil Posted June 4, 2013 Share Posted June 4, 2013 :agree:The prejudice against the South and Southerners is awful. North Easterns are far more hateful and smug.But I also agree with the principle of secessionColor me completely unsurprised that you support the principle of secession.As to prejudice, let's not forget that that South has lagged far, far beyond the rest of the nation in recognizing the civil rights of anyone other than straight, white Christian males. Yes, racism can be found anywhere in the US, but in the South it was, and some would say still is, codified into law in a way you just weren't going to find in, say, New York. Hell, the region rebelled against the federal government over their privilege to enslave other human beings. That kind of sentiment doesn't just evaporate, even after 150 years.But, again, I am unsurprised that prejudice against straight, white Christian males troubles you more than other, more pernicious, historical and widespread forms of bias. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ser Scot A Ellison Posted June 4, 2013 Author Share Posted June 4, 2013 Quoth,His "research" is pretty anecdotal and is a beautiful example of selection bias. I know one of his research trips was to Columbia. If he'd gotten into a conversation with me do you think it would be in his book? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.