Shryke Posted October 22, 2014 Share Posted October 22, 2014 They still aren't sure if there was even another shooter it seems. Shit is hectic during these events so who knows. Only 1 victim so far though. Years ago there was a group of young men in the process of being radicalized who got together in the woods to train. The plan was to attack the Parliament buildings, capture PM Stephen Harper and behead him. The government has been aware that our Parliament buildings have been a target for almost a decade now. The shooting at the War Memorial was easy, the honour guard are obviously just sitting ducks, standing on guard in honour of the dead. The idea that someone would shoot a soldier there is just disgusting. But the fact the shooter, carrying a long gun of some kind, got into Parliament and into the Great Hall, right outside the rooms where on either side the entire government was meeting in caucus and on the other side the Opposition was meeting in caucus, without being stopped, suggests a level of gross incompetence that is beyond belief. Eh. He was shot and killed before he did any damage inside the building. The system mostly works. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shryke Posted October 22, 2014 Share Posted October 22, 2014 Anyway, we all know the scariest thing here is what Harper will do using this as his reason. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pod The Impaler Posted October 22, 2014 Share Posted October 22, 2014 One shooter dead.One soldier dead. Police not certain that there are other suspects, but they are still looking. Anyway, we all know the scariest thing here is what Harper will do using this as his reason. :agree: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord of Oop North Posted October 22, 2014 Share Posted October 22, 2014 Maybe only a weird coincidence, but the updated CSIS Act that was to give CSIS increased powers to "fight terrorists" was supposed to be tabled this week. Bet that gets passed without much incident. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snake Posted October 22, 2014 Share Posted October 22, 2014 Anyway, we all know the scariest thing here is what Harper will do using this as his reason. I mentioned that to my girlfriend at lunch time. Hope the country doesn't get gripped in a state of fear and paranoia. My GF's mother is already panicking and swears she isn't travelling outside our province anymore and thinking that ISIS is gonna start invading. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arkhangel Posted October 22, 2014 Share Posted October 22, 2014 Maybe only a weird coincidence, but the updated CSIS Act that was to give CSIS increased powers to "fight terrorists" was supposed to be tabled this week. Bet that gets passed without much incident. You too, huh? I don't think there's anything conspiratorial about it, but I think it's pretty clear that security services always want to expand their powers and are not above opportunistically capitalising on tragedies and public fear to do so. The rise of ISIS has given a lot of agencies around the world the excuse they needed to start pushing for more power. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aemon Stark Posted October 22, 2014 Share Posted October 22, 2014 I mentioned that to my girlfriend at lunch time. Hope the country doesn't get gripped in a state of fear and paranoia. My GF's mother is already panicking and swears she isn't travelling outside our province anymore and thinking that ISIS is gonna start invading.It's ok. Something tells me ISIS won't manage well during a winter a Newfoundland let alone Labrador. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shryke Posted October 22, 2014 Share Posted October 22, 2014 It's ok. Something tells me ISIS won't manage well during a winter a Newfoundland let alone Labrador. Headline next summer: "ISIS bombing team found dead outside St-John's as snow-drifts melt" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aemon Stark Posted October 22, 2014 Share Posted October 22, 2014 Not an unrealistic headline given how terrible snow-clearing is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fragile Bird Posted October 22, 2014 Share Posted October 22, 2014 Shryke, can you imagine a lone gunmen getting into the US Congress or the Senate? That we didn't get a bloodbath is likely pretty damn lucky. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kairparavel Posted October 22, 2014 Share Posted October 22, 2014 You mean like when Denis Lortie got into the Quebec National Assembly? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ser Scot A Ellison Posted October 22, 2014 Share Posted October 22, 2014 With all the discussion about "possible" and "alleged" suspects still loose does the timeing of the shootings allow for one person to have accomplished them all? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
arya_underfoot Posted October 22, 2014 Share Posted October 22, 2014 Not sure how authentic this is, but the reports we're getting here in Australia (from a foreign correspondent of the state broadcaster) suggest that it was only one shooter who killed a guard at a war memorial and ran across the road into the parliament building. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fragile Bird Posted October 22, 2014 Share Posted October 22, 2014 Kair, yes, we don't seem to protect our democratic institutions very well, do we? Is it because most Canadians simply can't imagine doing something like this? Because very few of us own guns? And speaking of guns, with no long-gun registry, did the RCMP or CSIS even know this guy owned a gun? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kairparavel Posted October 22, 2014 Share Posted October 22, 2014 Downtown is still in lockdown and there has been no official confirmation on the second suspect, one way or the other. This from www.cbc.ca Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fragile Bird Posted October 22, 2014 Share Posted October 22, 2014 Not sure how authentic this is, but the reports we're getting here in Australia (from a foreign correspondent of the state broadcaster) suggest that it was only one shooter who killed a guard at a war memorial and ran across the road into the parliament building. We don't know enough details yet. It is suspected there were at least 2 people involved, because the gunman wore a particular kind of scarf on his head ("Arabic type head scarf" :dunno: ) and an eye-witness said there was a second man wearing the same kind of scarf in the background at the War Memorial. And Ottawa is still under lockdown while buildings are being searched. The gunman did not run across the street into the Parliament building, he used his gun to commandeer a car and drove up to the entrance. I think it's safe to say the plan was to kill members of parliament if possible. The shooter was born in Canada in 1982, Michael Zehaf-Bibeau, lived in Montreal for a while. On Monday another Quebec resident ran over two soldiers in a shopping mall parking lot, killing one of them. The killer then escaped with his car, flipped it at high speed, and was shot and killed after he got out of the car. His facebook page was filled with hateful radical Islamic material. He was known to authorities, had been reported by his parents, and people had been working with him to un-radicalize him (de-radicalize him?), including his imam. The victim was 24 year old Cpl. Nathan Cirillo, a reservist from Hamilton, Ontario. I'm not going to mention his killer's name without mentioning his name as well. Poor kid. My deepest sympathies to his family. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord of Oop North Posted October 22, 2014 Share Posted October 22, 2014 With all the discussion about "possible" and "alleged" suspects still loose does the timeing of the shootings allow for one person to have accomplished them all? I don't know what the timeline is, but the War Memorial is literally right across the road from Parliament. So, it would theoretically be possible to move between the two locations rather quickly, especially if he was driven, which is what is being suggested. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shryke Posted October 22, 2014 Share Posted October 22, 2014 Shryke, can you imagine a lone gunmen getting into the US Congress or the Senate? That we didn't get a bloodbath is likely pretty damn lucky. Is it lucky? Or is it that security pretty much worked? Cause it seems like this guy ran around with a gun in parliament and all that happened is he got shot and killed. That's the desired outcome. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TrueMetis Posted October 22, 2014 Share Posted October 22, 2014 Shryke, can you imagine a lone gunmen getting into the US Congress or the Senate? That we didn't get a bloodbath is likely pretty damn lucky. Not Shryke, but Yes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fragile Bird Posted October 22, 2014 Share Posted October 22, 2014 Is it lucky? Or is it that security pretty much worked? Cause it seems like this guy ran around with a gun in parliament and all that happened is he got shot and killed. That's the desired outcome. Lucky. He mis-timed things. Half an hour, 40 minutes later the caucus meetings would have been over and the hallway would have been full, the entryway to Parliament would have been the scene of interviews, possibly with the Security Minister because of the anti-terrorism legislation that was going to be introduced. Imagine if he had gunned down the Security Minister. The guy who who spied on the Toronto 18 wanne-be terrorist group is on the CBC just now wondering how the hell a gunman got in after all of that went down, and then Greenpeace broke into the Parliament buildings and hung that banner from the roof. Why hasn't there been vastly improved security? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.