Metopheles Posted March 16, 2014 Share Posted March 16, 2014 Mormont's Raven. good times, good times. three hundred peasants ask for food:"We are hungry , we need food or we die !""Die!, Die, die" *Goldcloaks move towards shocked peasants* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lady of Long Lake Posted March 16, 2014 Share Posted March 16, 2014 Dany - if the dragons pave her way to the throne. Littlefinger- he's too dirty and evil. Stannis -IF he still has Melisandre as his adviser Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boarsbane Posted March 16, 2014 Share Posted March 16, 2014 Stannis. Nobody in Westeros likes him as it is and they'll somehow manage to like him even less if by some miracle he actually took the throne. Plus he wanted to outlaw brothels, Robert would roll over in his grave... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jarl the climber Posted March 16, 2014 Share Posted March 16, 2014 I think topping Joffrey would be really hard. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Djinn Posted March 16, 2014 Share Posted March 16, 2014 Biter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snowisnobastard Posted March 16, 2014 Share Posted March 16, 2014 Shitmouth Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XSarellaX Posted March 16, 2014 Share Posted March 16, 2014 Mormont's Raven. good times, good times. three hundred peasants ask for food: "We are hungry , we need food or we die !" "Die!, Die, die" *Goldcloaks move towards shocked peasants* :rofl: I think you have a point here... Seriously, though, someone mentioned the High Septon, and I can't disagree with that. While cruel characters like Ramsey and Gregor would be absolutely terrible, I believe a teocracy could cause a more widespread and lasting damage in Westeros. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aerys Ahai Reborn Posted March 16, 2014 Share Posted March 16, 2014 snip Well then you could say Balon, Robb, and Renly, and Aegon the Conqueror were all "elected." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jarl the climber Posted March 16, 2014 Share Posted March 16, 2014 Shitmouth Fuck me with a bloody spear! I should have thought of that one. I think his policy of giving everyone an extra piece of bread would surely cause a famine throughout the Kingdom given time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Metopheles Posted March 16, 2014 Share Posted March 16, 2014 Well then you could say Balon, Robb, and Renly, and Aegon the Conqueror were all "elected." I don't know about Balon, Robb...I think the elected Ned thru him..but yes. Renly definitely. First choice anyway. Aegon.. Kinda hard to "elect". I like a united empire, but the time of the unification is shitty. I say he was accepted rather than elected. The Targs a generation later surely wouldve been elected, having seen the good that came with the unification.. :rofl: I think you have a point here... Seriously, though, someone mentioned the High Septon, and I can't disagree with that. While cruel characters like Ramsey and Gregor would be absolutely terrible, I believe a teocracy could cause a more widespread and lasting damage in Westeros. I did.. haha. Well, High Septon would be horrible (still better than Red Priest) but I posted more direct. High Sparrow. These parts were hard to read in feast. High Sparrow would be horrible. But I see him end like Savanorola. Cersei will undo her mistake. She'll get her revenge. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BornInTheShadows Posted March 16, 2014 Share Posted March 16, 2014 Definitely Cersei. That would be terrible. That's my realistic worst case scenario. I would rather have Dany on the throne than Cersei. And sorry to seem completely unable to use technology, but how do you do the response to other people's comments? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
modbelle Posted March 16, 2014 Share Posted March 16, 2014 Ramsay, obviously. Agrees. Ramsay might make people miss Aerys. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sifth Posted March 16, 2014 Share Posted March 16, 2014 Euron Greyjoy a pirate king, what could possibly go wrong with that, lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lady Howell Posted March 16, 2014 Share Posted March 16, 2014 Realistically, a lot of the characters people are rooting for to take the throne could all potentially and realistically turn out horrible rulers. DaenerysJon Stannis Sansa Aegon They could all turn out bad eggs. Or simply just incompetent rulers. Daenerys: has yet to show any ruling potential. She's just a conqueror right now. And even her record on that is debatable. Plus, the dragons make me wary of whether or not she'll turn out a benevolent ruler or adopt her dear old daddy's policies on how to handle problems in her kingdom. Jon: his arch doesn't deal with politics very much at all, and what politics it does deal with are rather simplistic, military politics. Not civilian or court politics. Stannis: Melisandre. Plus, he's unlovable. Sansa: what type of ruler she could turn out to be depends a lot on whom she ends up aligned with and what role she plays. Is she with the Vale? Does she go back North? Is she with Jon, Aegon, Littlefinger, or herself? Pawn or player? And if she's a player and not just a pawn or some accessory to someone else's rule, what type of player is she? Littlefinger or Cersei 2.0, the new and improved Robb with new boob and vagina features, or something else completely? There's a lot of questions there.Aegon: his origins are dubious, his claim shaky, his potential allies uneasy about him, and while he has the grooming to be a great king, so did hundreds of other monarchs who turned out to be rather shitty rulers. Him on the throne would be a reign plagued with controversy over his claim and the claims of his descendants for years to come. In a continent fresh out of civil war over conflicting and shaky claims to the throne and legitimacy, and probably heading straight into another war pretty soon, him even getting his ass onto the throne is a rather iffy situation. Honestly, though, if I had to take my pick of the worst possible scenario: Cersei. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~DarkHorse~ Posted March 16, 2014 Share Posted March 16, 2014 I think topping Joffrey would be really hard. They probably said that about Aerys too. ;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
harry_dresden Posted March 16, 2014 Share Posted March 16, 2014 YEah, Cersei would be the worst. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nictarion Posted March 16, 2014 Share Posted March 16, 2014 Littlefinger and Ramsay would be better suited than Dany. Well as far as I'm concerned, and I'd much rather see them sitting it sooner than her.Wow, hatred for Dany makes people say the strangest things. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nictarion Posted March 16, 2014 Share Posted March 16, 2014 Out of current contenders for the IT, Euron would be worst. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JonCon's Red Beard Posted March 16, 2014 Share Posted March 16, 2014 Mormont's Raven. good times, good times. three hundred peasants ask for food: "We are hungry , we need food or we die !" "Die!, Die, die" *Goldcloaks move towards shocked peasants* LOL. Euron, definitely. He doesn't think like a King, but a pirate and a rapist. He rather simply savage the kingdoms instead of actually doing something for them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joffrey fan Posted March 16, 2014 Share Posted March 16, 2014 Ramsay. Good lord, he would give the Mad King and Joffrey run for their money as the worst king ever. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.