Jump to content

Lady Anna

Members
  • Content Count

    359
  • Joined

  • Last visited

6 Followers

About Lady Anna

  • Rank
    Hedge Knight

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Array

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. I haven't actually thought about it in depth. It just seemed to me that that would be his purpose as a recognized son of Robert. Unlike the other bastards whose parentage hasn't been officially recognized, and with Shireen's likely fate, he is the last known Baratheon, if I'm not mistaken. That is, if everything stays the same and the Baratheons keep that seat by the end. I don't think he'll have another role in the intervening story; maybe he'll be chosen to be lord by whoever rules Westeros or the stormlands at the end.
  2. Probably to be the next Lord of Storm's End.
  3. Like others have said, many places in real life are named in that "obvious" fashion. I don't think it's lazy at all.
  4. Does Bran know that Robb and Catelyn died at the Twins?
  5. This is more of a thought but when prince Oberyn comes to King's Landing his entourage includes various members of several different Dornish houses. Why bring such a ''star-studded'' entourage? After all he was just coming to take his brother's place in the small council...or were they coming to attend Joffrey's wedding too?
  6. Yeah. After he passes away, and despite his own feelings on the matter, anything can happen. I'd be surprised if some sort of continuation or a book about the planned ending isn't released one day, even if it takes decades from now.
  7. My question is, if you don't believe it's a mystery, and you don't subscribe to any theory regarding Jon's parentage (I presume), why.......be here in this thread? After all this is a thread specifically made to discuss RLJ. Quoting people's posts just to say they're wrong because *you* specifically don't like theories on this subject - when you don't have anything to add to RLJ because you *don't* subscribe to it - then why do it? Let people theorize about RLJ in a thread specifically made for it.
  8. RLJ predates the show by many many years. It's not so much built on it, as reinforced by it. But we'll agree to disagree on this. About your last paragraph, sure it's a theory, but then if you don't consider it a mystery then there's nothing here to debate, in your understanding, is that correct? I just think you're mostly concerned about exact words, either from George himself or the books, and like I said that's fine. But others disagree and that's also fine.
  9. I'm definitely in the camp that thinks the show has more elements from the books than it's assumed. Denying that assumption is normal, but thinking otherwise is equally normal. Tha fact is, the show gave us more material to think about, and a lot of theories and discussions - even in the General forum here - are now based on what happened on screen. Yes, we all hated the show, it was terrible, but I think some things came definitely from George, and we need to accept that (hold the door, anyone?). Whether they will still happen on the books is another question, but at some point, for example, King Bran was an actual thing in George's mind. Imo the show, while being what it was, was still something George was involved in, and I think there are some good things to be taken from it.
  10. Sure he's never said who she is publicly (why would he just say it) but the showrunners knew. Since they said they got it right, and George says they got it right, and we all know what transpired in the show, it's a logical inference. It seems clear to me. But I see you disagree, that's fine.
  11. So do you think George is lying? Why would he lie to the people adapting his work, fellow creators/colleagues, and then to the readers?
×
×
  • Create New...