Jump to content

Why do men from The Reach and Stormlands hate Dornishmen?


Valens

Recommended Posts

1) Cultural differences

2) Dorne is the last reign to be incorporated to the Iron Throne, so there is a shorter common history (or a longer story of warring)

3) The failed conquest of Dorne of Daeron I is just 140 ago. it had everything to consolidate mutual loathing on both sides: unprovoked aggressions, betrayals, deceptions, deaths of charismatic leaders,...

4) Daeron II's favouritism towards Dorne is seen by many (specially in the Reach) as one of the main factors that lead to the Blackfyre Rebellions, with terrible effects to the realm.

5) In the last war the Reach and Dorne were on the same side, but only the Reach fully committed to it. Even though the Princess consort of Dragonstone was a Martell, the reachmen fought at Ashford and besieged Storm's End, while the Dornishmen didn't appear until the Trident (and only because Aerys was blackmailing them).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

5 minutes ago, The hairy bear said:

1) Cultural differences

2) Dorne is the last reign to be incorporated to the Iron Throne, so there is a shorter common history (or a longer story of warring)

3) The failed conquest of Dorne of Daeron I is just 140 ago. it had everything to consolidate mutual loathing on both sides: unprovoked aggressions, betrayals, deceptions, deaths of charismatic leaders,...

4) Daeron II's favouritism towards Dorne is seen by many (specially in the Reach) as one of the main factors that lead to the Blackfyre Rebellions, with terrible effects to the realm.

5) In the last war the Reach and Dorne were on the same side, but only the Reach fully committed to it. Even though the Princess consort of Dragonstone was a Martell, the reachmen fought at Ashford and besieged Storm's End, while the Dornishmen didn't appear until the Trident (and only because Aerys was blackmailing them).

Well, put it that way and now I too hate them. :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, King Merrett I Frey said:

 

Well, put it that way and now I too hate them. :P

Yeah...I used to like them because they are different, but now. They are quite vile, aren't they? I hate the fact they use poisons, that's so unworthy, so villainish. And the series didn't help me like them more recently, lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Valens said:

Yeah...I used to like them because they are different, but now. They are quite vile, aren't they? I hate the fact they use poisons, that's so unworthy, so villainish. And the series didn't help me like them more recently, lol.

I do like them. They are, apart from the North, the most culturally diverse region in the kingdoms. And as for poisons, it's good too, since to attack with poison requires poisons, which means either the ability to make them (subversive knowledge), to acquire them (subversive influences) and to employ it (stealth and a damn fine sense of alert), which makes them the poison use all good for me.

I think that the simplistic view the stormlanders and reachmen have on the dornish is that the one you have on the weird kid in class, which makes you feel uncomfortable but yet strangely interested. 

Dornish rule.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dornishmen also: 

- sacked highgarden and destroyed oakenseat, ancestral throne of gardener kings.

- produced wyl of wyl who was famous from his cruelty during first dornish war and chopping right hands of his prisoners.

- killed lyonel tyrell via scorpion trap.

- murdered king daeron i under peace panner and stole his crown.

- and many more things during both first dornish war and conquest of dorne.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Valens said:

Yeah...I used to like them because they are different, but now. They are quite vile, aren't they? I hate the fact they use poisons, that's so unworthy, so villainish. And the series didn't help me like them more recently, lol.

Olenna used poison, do you hate the Reach too?

Dorne in the past had always been relatively quiet unless the other roused them up, a stark king who invaded andalos was a lot worse and more cruel by miles compared to what the Dornish did. I can't help but wonder if the Reacg hate comes from "we have more than them but they kept beating us" mentality, i mean truly, Reach is richer and more powerful by million miles but Dorne had always beat them. Unreasonable hate is bound to happen, it's their ego talking

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Minstral said:

Kind of like asking why the English and French hated each other prior to the 21st century. They were at war with each other more times than they were at peace throughout their history.

Exactly

Or why Swedes and Danes used to hate each other, or Germans and French, Russians and Poles (I think...). They've been at each other many times and as such they build up long rivalries that goes deep into their cultures.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, redtree said:

Olenna used poison, do you hate the Reach too?

Dorne in the past had always been relatively quiet unless the other roused them up, a stark king who invaded andalos was a lot worse and more cruel by miles compared to what the Dornish did. I can't help but wonder if the Reacg hate comes from "we have more than them but they kept beating us" mentality, i mean truly, Reach is richer and more powerful by million miles but Dorne had always beat them. Unreasonable hate is bound to happen, it's their ego talking

Using one person for entire country is bad example. And i doubt that people hate dornishmen just because they use poisons.

 

Dornishmen can also be cruel. they raided reach during garth greybeard reign, destroyed ancestral throne of gardener kings, killed him (or mercy killed him as they say), and sacked it from all its wealth,while other dornish force have did same thing with oldtown.

They also were noted to organise raids on dornish marches even during peacetime (when they have been independent).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Valens said:

Is it simply because they are neighbours and not of the same race and because Dorne has always been autonomous? Or is there something more to it perhaps?

Dorne should have sent them some of their wine and lemons, sorted it all out by establishing trade but where's the fun in that.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In AFOC Arys Oakheart thinks about killing Dornishmen when he is in Sunspear. The Oakhearts are descendants of the gardener kings. It is not just the north that remembers and the mistrust must be deeply entrenched!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Paxter Redwyne said:

Using one person for entire country is bad example. And i doubt that people hate dornishmen just because they use poisons.

 

Dornishmen can also be cruel. they raided reach during garth greybeard reign, destroyed ancestral throne of gardener kings, killed him (or mercy killed him as they say), and sacked it from all its wealth,while other dornish force have did same thing with oldtown.

They also were noted to organise raids on dornish marches even during peacetime (when they have been independent).

Thank you! I wanted to reply to that, but it's better I didn't have to. ;) It might have been unpleasant, lol. I mean, that's just a dumb dumb thing to say. ONE person in The Reach doesn't represent the entire kingdom, which is otherwise known for breeding chivalrous and brave and honourable men. And the Dornishmen are cruel, yes. They are "colorful" but that doesn't excuse their wrongdoings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Paxter Redwyne said:

Using one person for entire country is bad example. And i doubt that people hate dornishmen just because they use poisons.

 

Dornishmen can also be cruel. they raided reach during garth greybeard reign, destroyed ancestral throne of gardener kings, killed him (or mercy killed him as they say), and sacked it from all its wealth,while other dornish force have did same thing with oldtown.

They also were noted to organise raids on dornish marches even during peacetime (when they have been independent).

Exactly, using only 1 person is a bad example. Oberyn used poison on his enemy who raped and killed his sister and her children, and then who else ? That specific statement is made for the poster i replied to btw

Was it terrible to raid ? Yes, but almost every single region has that occurance as a part of their history.
North=Theon Stark, cooking children and stuff
Westerland=Tywin Lannister
Iron Island=possibly every single of their ruler because raiding is their tradition
Riverland=Hoster Tully
Vale=Rape of Sistermen
Reach=Siege of Tumbleton 1 and 2, Siege of Spicetown
Stormland= no recorded history

 

16 minutes ago, Valens said:

Thank you! I wanted to reply to that, but it's better I didn't have to. ;) It might have been unpleasant, lol. I mean, that's just a dumb dumb thing to say. ONE person in The Reach doesn't represent the entire kingdom, which is otherwise known for breeding chivalrous and brave and honourable men. And the Dornishmen are cruel, yes. They are "colorful" but that doesn't excuse their wrongdoings.

Yes those honorable and brave men also committed siege of Tumbleton twice (to the point that prince Daeron was so disgusted by the cruelty he ordered them to stop but apparently those honorable men told him to chillax because it was how war is supposed to be), and Siege of Spicetown. Spicetown was noted to be a bigger trading port compared to KL yet the green killed EVERYONE. They also burnt almost every single building including High Tide, the seat of Velaryon. The damage was so devastating that it couldn't be rebuilt

You're right this is unpleasant, using reason to hate Dornish because they raid (even though almost everyone have raided) and because they use poison (um, only Oberyn used poison so far) is a clear double standard and a dumb dumb thing to say

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...