Donny2Bong Posted June 21, 2016 Share Posted June 21, 2016 What does the outcome of the battle of the bastards now mean for House Glover, considering that they rejected the stark fealty ? and pretty much abused jon and sansa and condemned Robs rebellion ??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gertrude Posted June 21, 2016 Share Posted June 21, 2016 They won't be invited over for tea anytime soon? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spivo Posted June 21, 2016 Share Posted June 21, 2016 While I like the show, I have a feeling this will be forgotten. Anyway, there are more important things for us to see in the 50 minutes each episode lasts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Chequered Raven Posted June 21, 2016 Share Posted June 21, 2016 17 minutes ago, Gertrude said: They won't be invited over for tea anytime soon? Well, as we have seen Show-North does NOT remmber, so I would guess they have a good chance to be invited. And if they even support the cakes they will be very welcome... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gertrude Posted June 21, 2016 Share Posted June 21, 2016 Well, the Northern Lords don't remember, but the servants do. If they did come for tea, they can expect spit in their cups and burnt biscuits. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tormond Posted June 21, 2016 Share Posted June 21, 2016 Because of the threat of the walkers im sure Jon will have no problem and might even ask them again to join the fight for their own good. Sansa on the other hand with her now smug pompous face might tell them an angry word of two Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
watcher of the night Posted June 21, 2016 Share Posted June 21, 2016 That they are dog food. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Hound 25 Posted June 21, 2016 Share Posted June 21, 2016 2 hours ago, Gertrude said: They won't be invited over for tea anytime soon? Unless they bring lemon cakes for Sansa Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dbunting Posted June 21, 2016 Share Posted June 21, 2016 The series and characters have far more important things to focus on than dealing with one family. At most we may get a scene next season where the Starks call their bannermen to Winterfell to discuss the war to come and you would get the Glovers' swearing fealty then, and eating a little crow in the process. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WolfOfWinter Posted June 24, 2016 Share Posted June 24, 2016 Pretty much everyone rejected the Starks except Houses Mormont and Hornwood and some other minor house. I'm curious to see what they'll do with Karhold, Last Hearth and the Dreadfort. I'd give Least Hearth to Tormund who makes a better Umber than that bastard Smalljon did, but I'm not sure about the other two. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cron Posted June 24, 2016 Share Posted June 24, 2016 1 hour ago, WolfOfWinter said: Pretty much everyone rejected the Starks except Houses Mormont and Hornwood and some other minor house. I'm curious to see what they'll do with Karhold, Last Hearth and the Dreadfort. I'd give Least Hearth to Tormund who makes a better Umber than that bastard Smalljon did, but I'm not sure about the other two. Good stuff. And I agree with tormond above that, yeah, ihn light of the WW threat, Jon's gotta mend fences with the Glovers, and bring 'em into the fold. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trump the Builder Posted June 24, 2016 Share Posted June 24, 2016 On 6/21/2016 at 7:14 AM, dbunting said: The series and characters have far more important things to focus on than dealing with one family. At most we may get a scene next season where the Starks call their bannermen to Winterfell to discuss the war to come and you would get the Glovers' swearing fealty then, and eating a little crow in the process. they are going to eat Olly? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frances Bean Corbray Posted June 24, 2016 Share Posted June 24, 2016 Robbet "I could get flayed just for talking to you" Glover did indeed get flayed just for talking to them [The Starks], and was the named character on the burning cross/range marker we were promised, so we will probably not see any Glovers, one way or another, from this point forward. ["Glover" might get name dropped as falling in line in a future Northern Lord role call like when Jon was listing Flint, Hornwood, et. al as minor houses they could still recruit into a big enough blob to combat Ramsay's Karstark/Umber coalition, but I'm pretty sure they're done being on-screen.] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dames do Moan Posted June 24, 2016 Share Posted June 24, 2016 Jon will put them to death and Sansa the physcopath will feed their kids to Ramsey's dogs. And Deepwood Motte will be given over to Dolores Edd after he deserts the nights watch following their lord commanders lead. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cas Stark Posted June 24, 2016 Share Posted June 24, 2016 On 6/21/2016 at 7:14 AM, dbunting said: The series and characters have far more important things to focus on than dealing with one family. At most we may get a scene next season where the Starks call their bannermen to Winterfell to discuss the war to come and you would get the Glovers' swearing fealty then, and eating a little crow in the process. Why should anyone come when the Starks call their banners? I thought the North was sick of war and sick of Stark wars and sick of the Starks and aren't loyal? Why not tell them what they told them 3 weeks ago: you're not Starks, and we're sick of you. They're not wardens of the North and are still officially enemies of the state and they have no more men. It would be just as easy to tell them to fuck off next week and next season as it was this season. Everyone could just as easily stay home, except we know they won't, we know that when the Starks call their banners everyone will be loyal again, like those previous episodes never happened. And people will continue to claim this isn't awful, inconsistent storytelling by inventing all kinds of detailed rationales why it in fact makes perfect sense that the guy who told you to fuck off last week is this week back to being the same loyal guy he was in season 2. Hilariously awful. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hol Horse Posted June 24, 2016 Share Posted June 24, 2016 Abused? Your shell must be paper-thin if you consider that abuse. House Glover was looking out for its best interest; not like they could predict Jon SnuSnu's victory via deus ex machina. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bb1180 Posted June 24, 2016 Share Posted June 24, 2016 Assuming that its addressed in the show, I would expect that Jon/Sansa will offer pardons to the Northern houses that didn't join them against the Boltons if they will once again swear oaths of fealty to House Stark. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jandslegate Posted June 25, 2016 Share Posted June 25, 2016 On 6/21/2016 at 3:13 AM, Gertrude said: They won't be invited over for tea anytime soon? This is fairly accurate. They need a unified North but I'm pretty sure they won't hold any favor with the Starks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Lannister Posted June 25, 2016 Share Posted June 25, 2016 So long as they swear fealty now, I expect the matter will be overlooked if not forgotten. First they didn't help the Boltons either. Second, it's not as if Jon and Sansa have the resources to go around subjugating the Northern houses who didn't help even if they wanted. The Vale army isn't going to do that and the second they sent the wildlings against another Northern house, the rest of the North likely would rebel against them. It's the Karstarks, Umbers and of course Boltons whose lands are on the table to be dished out as rewards to those loyal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
House Mosse Posted June 26, 2016 Share Posted June 26, 2016 On 24/06/2016 at 10:07 PM, Cas Stark said: Why should anyone come when the Starks call their banners? I thought the North was sick of war and sick of Stark wars and sick of the Starks and aren't loyal? Why not tell them what they told them 3 weeks ago: you're not Starks, and we're sick of you. They're not wardens of the North and are still officially enemies of the state and they have no more men. It would be just as easy to tell them to fuck off next week and next season as it was this season. Everyone could just as easily stay home, except we know they won't, we know that when the Starks call their banners everyone will be loyal again, like those previous episodes never happened. And people will continue to claim this isn't awful, inconsistent storytelling by inventing all kinds of detailed rationales why it in fact makes perfect sense that the guy who told you to fuck off last week is this week back to being the same loyal guy he was in season 2. Hilariously awful. 3 weeks ago, Sansa was not a Stark, she was a Bolton. Then Ramsay got his face eaten off. Now she is legitimately the head of House Stark, and she holds Winterfell. The Lady of Winterfell with a bastard son of Eddard Stark to lead her armies is an entirely different prospect than the female beggar Lord, in opposition to her Warden of the North husband and with a bastard Brother, that she was three weeks ago. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.