Jump to content

Football: Sieg oder Spielabbruch!


A Horse Named Stranger
 Share

Recommended Posts

On 10/12/2023 at 7:08 PM, BigFatCoward said:

What on earth are you on about? From the end of their last league title to Klopp taking over they won and lost a champions league final, won a uefa cup final and won multiple fa and league cups. They were also perennial top 4 contenders, going close to winning the league a few times. And their lowest finish was 8th. 

I think you don't understand what a laughing stock is, or what a lack of success looks like for most (proper) fans, which I suppose is the point. 

They were hugely succesful compared to every other English club, just less than Man Utd, Chelsea and Arsenal, and lately City. 

Yeah, it's either I don't know what a laughing stock is or you are forgetting all the "haven't won a title for 30 years" crap that has been thrown Liverpool fans way until Klopp finally ended that one.

Also, in the late '80s and early '90s standards for Liverpool have been way above the rest of English football so all that trophies you mention haven't been seen as success (other than Champions League, obviously) and it was always about not winning the title. And no, Liverpool were definitely not also a "perennial top 4 contenders", having ended up below 4th 7 times between 04/05 and 15/16 (Klopp's first incomplete season), being 5th only once (6th, 7th and 8th twice each).

It's the same as with United in the last 10 years. They've also won Europa league, FA and League cup, and have ended in top in 5 seasons out of last 10, since Fergie retired. Guess what? They are a laughing stock.

This notion that your club needs to not win anything ever or you're not a "proper fan" is plain stupid, but you are entitled to your opinion as stupid as it may be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, lacuna said:

Østigård does well for Napoli, Ryerson for Dortmund, Ajer for Brentford, Berge for Burnley, Aursnes for Benfica, Bobb for Man City, Sørloth in La Liga... Not superstars, but they hold their own. Just can't get things to gel, it seems.

I'd be shocked if Nusa stays at Brugge for long, too. Really exciting player.

 

Nusa is a lot of fun. Would love him over at Arsenal.

Edited by Mexal
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, baxus said:

 

This notion that your club needs to not win anything ever or you're not a "proper fan" is plain stupid, but you are entitled to your opinion as stupid as it may be.

Never said this. I said you aren't a proper fan if you only support someone because they are succesful and you have no actual links to the club.

Not the same at all. If you are a born and bread city fan for example who put up with years of shite, good for you. 

Rest of your argument is preposterous, over a 30 year period they were the 4th or 5th most succesful club depending how you slice it. And miles ahead of the next most successful. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/12/2023 at 7:34 PM, Consigliere said:

As an aside: English football has been massively popular in South Africa for a very long time

Since the earlier 20th century at the least. My grandfather supported Arsenal since the 1930s.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, BigFatCoward said:

What would he cost? 

 

 

A Scholes? Hard to say coz which team with a fully-fledged Scholes on their hand is gonna let him go for any amount of money? Like what would you accept for Bruno G? 

 

 

But I'd accept a younger player with at least something of that, with the potential to maybe get there someday. 

Edited by polishgenius
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: Norway, biggest problem isn't that we don't have good attacking players at this time, it's that we're shit at the back.

Østigård is ok at CB and Ryerson is decent at RB. Our second CB is shit by every international metric, our LB is quite average and our keeper is at best mediocre. We lost to Scotland owing to them being terrible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Too true, but I feel like teams like Portugal and especially Croatia have done much, much more with a similar outset in recent history.

People say that Belgium wasted their golden generation - but hell, at least they managed to qualify for stuff, so what do we call this?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry, but it's not similar. Portugal's "lost" generation around Luis Figo had a better team. Belgian's golden generation was also a much better team.

Norway has like 4-5 really good players, with Odegaard and Haalend being genuine World Class on their days.

You can do a mental experiment and compare those Portugese and Belgian teams with your current Norwegian one. Then you can shuffle around ask yourself, which Norwegian would break into their Starting XI, and vice versa.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, A Horse Named Stranger said:

Sorry, but it's not similar. Portugal's "lost" generation around Luis Figo had a better team. Belgian's golden generation was also a much better team.

Norway has like 4-5 really good players, with Odegaard and Haalend being genuine World Class on their days.

You can do a mental experiment and compare those Portugese and Belgian teams with your current Norwegian one. Then you can shuffle around ask yourself, which Norwegian would break into their Starting XI, and vice versa.

It's been 23 years since we last played in a WC/EC. All I'm saying is that we should at least be able to qualify for something at some point. That shouldn't be out of reach for this squad, in this group, though Spain should definitely win the group on average.

I mentioned Portugal thinking specifically of their recent EC winning side, with some high level stars and solid-but-not Earth-shattering players elsewhere. Not even arguing that our players are better, just that it should be enough to qualify.

Croatia took third and second place in the last two WCs, which many would call "punching above one's weight". So why are they very, very good, while we are utter, utter shit? Again, not saying we're better, just...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, lacuna said:

It's been 23 years since we last played in a WC/EC. All I'm saying is that we should at least be able to qualify for something at some point. That shouldn't be out of reach for this squad, in this group, though Spain should definitely win the group on average.

I mentioned Portugal thinking specifically of their recent EC winning side, with some high level stars and solid-but-not Earth-shattering players elsewhere. Not even arguing that our players are better, just that it should be enough to qualify.

Croatia took third and second place in the last two WCs, which many would call "punching above one's weight". So why are they very, very good, while we are utter, utter shit? Again, not saying we're better, just...

I know almost nothing about Norway, but this Croatia national team was always carried by their midfield. Having prime Modric, Rakitic, Kovacic and Brozovic all on your team is a luxury.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, lacuna said:

Croatia took third and second place in the last two WCs, which many would call "punching above one's weight". So why are they very, very good, while we are utter, utter shit? Again, not saying we're better, just...

You are underestimating the actual individual talent there.

Modric, Rakitic, Kovacic, Mandzukic. That is more than solid, that's a pretty good core. If you had either Rakitic or Modric to play alongside Odegaard, that would make your team much better instantly.

Talking about lost generations, it'd be tragic and hillarious, if this England team fails to win a trophy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, A Horse Named Stranger said:

You are underestimating the actual individual talent there.

And you're not getting what I'm saying. We're not as good as Croatia of the last decade, currently or ever. The proof is in the pudding.

What I'm saying is, I don't even care if we progress from a tournament group stage at this point, much less go deep - just *qualify*. Is that so much to ask? Have a couple of games where we're not teeter-tottering against on paper much weaker teams, and maybe even cause some problems for decidedly stronger ones, you know? Like, ever?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think for Norway, mentality is a big block too. We've tried a lot of different football over quite a period of time, and we've been consistently bad. Now, we're struggling to come to grips with a new playing style again.

I tend to think we could be better, but it would require us to start bedding in Nusa and Bobb consistently, drop Berg for Berge and never, ever select Strandberg again. Getting another keeper would be a bonus too. 

With that, I think we can qualify (with a bit of luck), but it's by no means guaranteed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...