Jump to content

Reading Joe Abercrombie's The First Law for the first time. (Spoilers for Books 1-3)


Ded As Ned

Recommended Posts

Dammit Joe Abercrombie. I feel like an ass asking this when you're in the thread (I definitely don't expect you to answer something negative about your writing style).



The thing that bothered me about BSC was the one-dimensionality of the character habits. Each one was a little collection of repetitive tics. It was kind of charming in the trilogy where the story was new. But in such a long book centered around the same characters constantly as BSC, it got awfully monotonous. Is The Heroes the same way? Because if it's not, I'll give it a try, but if it is, no matter how good the story is, it's going to drive me crazy and I'm not going to appreciate it.


Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dammit Joe Abercrombie. I feel like an ass asking this when you're in the thread (I definitely don't expect you to answer something negative about your writing style).

The thing that bothered me about BSC was the one-dimensionality of the character habits. Each one was a little collection of repetitive tics. It was kind of charming in the trilogy where the story was new. But in such a long book centered around the same characters constantly as BSC, it got awfully monotonous. Is The Heroes the same way? Because if it's not, I'll give it a try, but if it is, no matter how good the story is, it's going to drive me crazy and I'm not going to appreciate it.

I would say from my entirely unbiased position that the Heroes is probably less tic-based. Less character-based altogether, in a way, sort of ... I dunno ... An ensemble? Of course, you may dislike it for entirely other reasons.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The thing that bothered me about BSC was the one-dimensionality of the character habits. Each one was a little collection of repetitive tics. It was kind of charming in the trilogy where the story was new. But in such a long book centered around the same characters constantly as BSC, it got awfully monotonous. Is The Heroes the same way? Because if it's not, I'll give it a try, but if it is, no matter how good the story is, it's going to drive me crazy and I'm not going to appreciate it.

I don't think most of the characters in The Heroes have tics in the same way that Friendly or Morveer did in BSC, although there are some exceptions. I think overall I preferred the character development in The Heroes to BSC, while BSC was relentlessly cynical about its characters, The Heroes is only cynical most of the time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I feel like BSC has probably the best payoff of the standalone books. The last half of the book is just... wow. That said, getting there was a bit tough. I was getting a bit tired of the unrelenting grimness of it, of awful people doing awful things.





I feel people who disliked my books need to be pitied rather than hated.



With the proper encouragement they may improve themselves, learn, grow, deepen their understanding, and come back to the books when they're ready for them...




Have you tried celery? Perhaps of the moral variety?


Link to comment
Share on other sites

I feel like BSC has probably the best payoff of the standalone books. The last half of the book is just... wow. That said, getting there was a bit tough. I was getting a bit tired of the unrelenting grimness of it, of awful people doing awful things.

Have you tried celery? Perhaps of the moral variety?

Maybe they need more Important Human Themes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Surprisingly (at least for me), Best Served Cold is the most divisive of Abercrombie's book.

After ARC came out, we did a voting round in this forum (with people giving 5 to heir favourite book, 4 to the second, and so on). IIRC, BSC came third (after TH and LAOK), but the votes were really sparse: everyone had placed it either as one of the best two books, or one of the two worst ones.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I loved BSC. It may be my favourite book in the series (although I loved the Heroes when I recently reread it).



What makes it work for me is the black humour. Most of the protagonists can't even be called anti-heroes. They're downright evil. That could make the book very depressing, but the humour prevents this.



It's as if George Martin wrote a blackly comic novel set in Westeros, in which the main protagonists are Vargo Hoat, Ser Gregor Clegane, Ramsay Bolton, Septon Utt, Shitmouth, and the Tickler.


Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...