Jump to content

Football - Trouncing Matilda's.


BigFatCoward
 Share

Recommended Posts

Australia switched confederations from OFC to AFC. It can be done. However, as I said, Saudi Arabia are extremely unlikely to go down that route as their NT would not qualify for a major tournament for a very, very long time playing in UEFA qualifiers.

 

Edited by Consigliere
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Australia switched confederations because it benefited everyone involved - Australia would get a higher level opponents while still being able to qualify for World Cup, AFC would get another WC level team which in the long term would help them increase the level of competition and gain more WC spots, while the rest of OFC would no longer have that one juggernaut who would smack everyone (except maybe New Zealand) around, walk through the qualifiers and ruin everyone's motivation to even take part.

Saudis to Europe would be nowhere near that, and it would significantly complicate things, especially for teams from smaller FAs. Just getting their team to Saudi Arabia would be pretty challenging for Faroe Islands, for example.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Saudi Arabia would not join UEFA anyway so there's no point discussing further. Saudi Arabia are one of the stronger sides in AFC and with the expanded WC, they are practically guaranteed qualification. The 4-year club coefficient also ranks the Saudi Pro League as the #1 league in AFC. They aren't going to give up that status. That's why the rumours have been about them trying to weasel their way into getting a wild card entry to the CL but the ECA will never allow that.

Edited by Consigliere
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, baxus said:

Why would UEFA take them in as new members? The only UEFA members outside of Europe are FAs from former Soviet Union republics who were considered as members of UEFA by default after Soviet Union collapsed, and Israel, for obvious reasons.

Plus Turkey, its lion share of territory is geographically in Asia. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, baxus said:

Football supporters are not the same as their golf counterparts. Are there really golf counterparts? In the end, the money  in football comes from supporters. If supporters go away, the sponsors, broadcast money etc. will soon follow.

Were you around when that Superleague attempt was made?

The Super League is what caused my posting in these threads to go up. I find sports business to be as fascinating as the games themselves. The problem with the SL is the powers at be tried to completely change the system and did so with a giant fuck you. If they had not done the latter maybe it could have worked, or at least they could have laid the groundwork for it happening in the future. 

At the end of the day every sports league is a business. A former president of a MLB team that I actually got to interview with said he didn't want Qatari money for a sponsorship, but if they paid two or three times what he was asking for he'd have no choice. NFL and NBA teams are starting to warm up to the petrol dollars. That same money owns clubs in Europe. It will eat Tennis in the next decade if the sport wants more money. Soccer fans in Europe will be the biggest holdouts to this shift, but Idk if you guys can stop it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Spockydog said:

Once again, football is nothing like tennis. Or golf. Or any other individual sport.

No Saudi (or American) team is ever getting into the UCL.

Money talks. Never say never, especially in an industry that's massively corrupt, everyone knows it's corrupt and nobody really cares. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

United's board and owners are absolutely disgusting. The whistleblowers who leaked the board's plans to The Athletic are legends. Crafton's latest article in The Athletic: https://archive.ph/fOzgj

 

Quote

Manchester United’s plan to bring back Mason Greenwood was so advanced that the club even prepared documents outlining the type of images that should be taken of the player during training sessions and planned how manager Erik ten Hag should handle questions during an anticipated media storm. According to sources with knowledge of United’s planning, who remain anonymous because they are not authorised to speak publicly, the club’s preparations for Greenwood’s return also included an assessment of the expected sentiment of external figures, listing individual football pundits, journalists and politicians and stating whether they would be for or against Greenwood’s reintegration.

The planning divided these people into categories to the effect of “supportive”, “open-minded” or “hostile”. The club’s document listed a series of domestic abuse charities assumed to be “hostile”. The internal process has not consulted any charities specialised in supporting women in cases where alleged domestic or sexual abuse has occurred.

The Athletic has also been told by sources close to the club, who will remain anonymous in order to protect their positions, that senior Manchester United executives held multiple intense meetings with staff after we reported on Wednesday that some employees feel ashamed by the club’s decision.

Some staff members have discussed resigning in the event United continue to pursue the plan laid out by Arnold, while others have considered coordinated action, with some staff even exploring a strike.


The most extreme measures, however, remain hypothetical until the club formally communicates a decision, while it is also the reality of a situation such as this that aggrieved employees are more likely to speak to journalists than those who are either on the fence or supportive of the decision.


United’s concern on Thursday and Friday, however, was sufficient for crisis meetings to take place, which involved United executives seeking to justify a return for Greenwood to staff, while also claiming no final decision had been made. Many staff were left with the impression, though, that the plan to bring him back remains.

 

Edited by Consigliere
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, BigFatCoward said:

On Lewis Hall, the Chelsea fans online are doing their nut online about them getting rid, that's enough of an endorsement for me.  Notwithstanding that this thread shows that Chelsea fans know fuck all about football. 

Why? He was fourth choice. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...