A wilding Posted June 2, 2022 Share Posted June 2, 2022 Personally I just want Elizabeth to hang on for another couple of years. To beat the Sun King and to one up on the French. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zorral Posted June 2, 2022 Share Posted June 2, 2022 5 hours ago, Cas Stark said: $600 million net worth makes the queen not even one of the richest people in the UK. Presumably those are the russians? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cas Stark Posted June 2, 2022 Share Posted June 2, 2022 29 minutes ago, Zorral said: Presumably those are the russians? Apparently the richest family in the UK is Hindu. https://www.thetimes.co.uk/sunday-times-rich-list Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Varysblackfyre321 Posted June 2, 2022 Share Posted June 2, 2022 19 minutes ago, Cas Stark said: Apparently the richest family in the UK is Hindu. https://www.thetimes.co.uk/sunday-times-rich-list I’m sold they should be the Royal family Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spockydog Posted June 3, 2022 Share Posted June 3, 2022 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spockydog Posted June 3, 2022 Share Posted June 3, 2022 This makes me very happy. The Great, Slow-Motion Humiliation of Piers Morgan Quote For all the promotional fanfare, Morgan has gone from Good Morning Britain to good evening no one. The show has averaged just 62,000 viewers per night, a staggeringly low figure for a peak time slot, and at some times has even attracted a number of viewers so low it officially registered as zero with one audience research board. For Morgan, there may be no darker fate. So what is actually happening with this show, which proclaims itself to be an explosive, no-holds-barred forum for Morgan’s most outrageous opinions? I watched a full broadcast and found a bizarre collage of content. Over a very long-feeling hour, Morgan railed against the rise in shoplifting during a cost-of-living crisis; reported on Elon Musk’s latest tweets; spoke to various pickled-looking talking heads including Howie Mandel and Anne Robinson, the widely despised host of The Weakest Link, about whether or not Morgan was going to get invited to Simon Cowell’s wedding, what a “woman” is, taking the knee, police in rainbow helmets, and “saving Britain from the woke virus.” I began to dissociate as Robinson started debating whether giving trans people rights would have a detrimental effect on aristocrats inheriting their family estates through ancient British primogeniture traditions. Whom is any of this for? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spockydog Posted June 3, 2022 Share Posted June 3, 2022 It really is time start binning the glorification of the British Empire, an undeniably evil and racist endeavour. And, no, the building of some bridges in Nigeria does not negate all the theft, slavery, and general fucking cuntishness of it all. A good place to start would be the honours system. Knight of the Most Excellent Order of the British Empire? GTFOH. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spockydog Posted June 3, 2022 Share Posted June 3, 2022 When thousands of swivel-eyed royalists are booing a Tory prime minister, you know the game is up. JFC Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
polishgenius Posted June 3, 2022 Share Posted June 3, 2022 No, they're saying Boo-oris. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Anti-Targ Posted June 3, 2022 Share Posted June 3, 2022 18 hours ago, Cas Stark said: It might be arbitrary in their day to day lives since they have the use of the castles and palaces and jewelry and art that are owned by the state, but when the time comes that the monarchy is abolished, the monarch is only worth about $600M and only privately owns a handful of those residences/jewels/art. $600 million net worth makes the queen not even one of the richest people in the UK. So they will be absolutely fine then, for generations to come, so long as they don't squander it with greed and incompetence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Varysblackfyre321 Posted June 3, 2022 Share Posted June 3, 2022 30 minutes ago, The Anti-Targ said: So they will be absolutely fine then, for generations to come, so long as they don't squander it with greed and incompetence. Hell they and their immediate descendents wouldn’t have to work a day in their life too meet out a living that’d be more comfortable than 99% of humanity. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spockydog Posted June 3, 2022 Share Posted June 3, 2022 Harry and Meghan got the biggest cheers. I'll bet the sour-faced one absolutely loved that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Varysblackfyre321 Posted June 3, 2022 Share Posted June 3, 2022 2 hours ago, Spockydog said: This makes me very happy. The Great, Slow-Motion Humiliation of Piers Morgan On the primogeniture thing: To many conservatives the issue of what a woman is only concerning as far establishing their hierarchy which is as follows: God(who is a man despite not having a penis), men, small men(otherwise known asboys), man’s best friend(male dogs), depending on your country men’s guns(otherwise known as metal penises), and then finally women/girls. I’m being slightly facetious. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spockydog Posted June 3, 2022 Share Posted June 3, 2022 "When the Labour leader, Keir Starmer, arrived minutes later, the crowd remained quiet." It's better than being booed, I suppose. At least, that's probably what his spad whispered in his ear as he walked sadly to his seat. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Denvek Posted June 3, 2022 Share Posted June 3, 2022 1 hour ago, Varysblackfyre321 said: On the primogeniture thing: To many conservatives the issue of what a woman is only concerning as far establishing their hierarchy which is as follows: God(who is a man despite not having a penis), men, small men(otherwise known asboys), man’s best friend(male dogs), depending on your country men’s guns(otherwise known as metal penises), and then finally women/girls. I’m being slightly facetious. How trans aristocrats fit into primogeniture is a genuine reason why self-identifying stopped being a valid way of legally changing your birth certificate back in the 1970s. https://inews.co.uk/news/long-reads/secret-court-case-50-years-ago-robbed-transgender-people-rights-1291857 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Varysblackfyre321 Posted June 3, 2022 Share Posted June 3, 2022 11 minutes ago, Denvek said: How trans aristocrats fit into primogeniture is a genuine reason why self-identifying stopped being a valid way of legally changing your birth certificate back in the 1970s. https://inews.co.uk/news/long-reads/secret-court-case-50-years-ago-robbed-transgender-people-rights-1291857 Damn the UK used to be way more cool in regards to trans people. I guess it’s wrong to say the UK is regressing in regards to trans rights. Transphobic extremists are just radically pushing the country into a radically bad direction. Still it’s best to junk the whole sexism thing too in regards to primogeniture. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Poobah Posted June 3, 2022 Share Posted June 3, 2022 1 hour ago, Denvek said: How trans aristocrats fit into primogeniture is a genuine reason why self-identifying stopped being a valid way of legally changing your birth certificate back in the 1970s. https://inews.co.uk/news/long-reads/secret-court-case-50-years-ago-robbed-transgender-people-rights-1291857 Sad to think it was better for trans people here in a century ago than it is now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Varysblackfyre321 Posted June 3, 2022 Share Posted June 3, 2022 11 minutes ago, Poobah said: Sad to think it was better for trans people here in a century ago than it is now. Or it can be looked as a realistic and natural place to get back to. The culture warrior right(the treacherous and cowardly lot they are) do love to pretend their level of bigotry on a given was always the norm in their society until a recent point, they try to frame their radical moves as keeping within that norm. It can be good to take this argument from when it’s applicable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heartofice Posted June 3, 2022 Share Posted June 3, 2022 23 minutes ago, Poobah said: Sad to think it was better for trans people here in a century ago than it is now. Luckily it's not true. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Varysblackfyre321 Posted June 3, 2022 Share Posted June 3, 2022 15 minutes ago, Heartofice said: Luckily it's not true. Unluckily it is. On a loose note When do you think the tories will ban torturing trans kids to fix them(politically correct term conversion therapy)? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.