Jump to content

Watch, Watched, Watching: Watching Severance and working for Lumon


Veltigar
 Share

Recommended Posts

15 minutes ago, hauberk said:

Coppola was in over his depth. 

Well, things seemed to work out.  Hell, you could say he was most over his depth in a ton of ways with Apocalypse Now.  But if I was making a list of greatest movies ever, that'd be in the top five.  Do agree most of his career since then has been incredibly disappointing.  Definitely no argument there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I watched The Outfit, which I thought was a good thriller. The claustrophobic setting with the entire film taking place in the tailor's shop did help with the tension. The acting was good, particularly Mark Rylance in the lead role.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DMC said:

Well, things seemed to work out.  Hell, you could say he was most over his depth in a ton of ways with Apocalypse Now.  But if I was making a list of greatest movies ever, that'd be in the top five.  Do agree most of his career since then has been incredibly disappointing.  Definitely no argument there.

You’re not wrong. Except it’s “in over his head” or “out of his depth.” Jeez you guys.

That said, I’m really curious about Megalopolis

1 hour ago, williamjm said:

I watched The Outfit, which I thought was a good thriller. The claustrophobic setting with the entire film taking place in the tailor's shop did help with the tension. The acting was good, particularly Mark Rylance in the lead role.

I liked Rylance in it but I didn’t care for the movie at all. I dunno. The climax just didn’t work for me. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Deadlines? What Deadlines? said:

ou’re not wrong. Except it’s “in over his head” or “out of his depth.” Jeez you guys.

Hey, I'm no grammar or idiom police, was just responding.  Although, "over his depth" kinda makes sense to me as shorthand for "the water's over your head."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Deadlines? What Deadlines? said:

Aquaman 2 just hit streaming here.

Should I? Hrmm. I don’t know…

Maybe? I…

Don't do it, son. You're a young man with your whole life ahead of you. You're worth more than that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, DMC said:

Hey, I'm no grammar or idiom police, was just responding.  Although, "over his depth" kinda makes sense to me as shorthand for "the water's over your head."

For all intensive purposes, this isn't rocket surgery.

Gawd!

Edited by Deadlines? What Deadlines?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, DireWolfSpirit said:

If its spotlighted or heavily marketed and I find myself wondering "if I should watch" ...... the answers nearly always, No I should not have fell for it.

The Marvels is mercifully short. I think I might check it out just to see what all the buzz is about. 

Has anyone seen Dumb Money? There's a documentary on the same subject on Crave but I think I want to see the film first. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, DMC said:

To be clear I wasn't intending to cast any aspersions at all on anybody else's opinion, just thought the coincidence was very amusing.

And you are right!  Shows that I should always read the preceding posts before I post! :ph34r:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, A True Kaniggit said:

If you say one thing about the Hobbit movies, you can say they gave us this song by Ed Sheeran.

https://youtu.be/2fngvQS_PmQ?si=4ReJBFZNHnYSZFTM

 

I enjoy rewatching parts of the first movie and the scenes in Smaugs lair.

I still believe you could make one good movie out of the 3.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sonny's death is  a moment of heightened reality to reflect the enormity of Sonny's assassination, and the larger-than-life nature of Sonny himself, although this aspect of things is much more explicit in the novel. James Caan was an average-sized guy, while Sonny Corleone in the novel is a massive hulk of a man, not especially tall (just short of 6') but built like a bull (also, hung like one, but that's a subplot that Coppola, uh, snipped.)

He essentially exists on a kind of grandiose, heroic scale, a man of excesses -- excesses of violence, of anger, of pride, of lust -- and dies in a suitably grandiose, excessive way.

Coppola was right on the mark, IMO.

Edited by Ran
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Ran said:

Sonny's death is  a moment of heightened reality to reflect the enormity of Sonny's assassination, and the larger-than-life nature of Sonny himself, although this aspect of things is much more explicit in the novel. James Caan was an average-sized guy, while Sonny Corleone in the novel is a massive hulk of a man, not especially tall (just short of 6') but built like a bull (also, hung like one, but that's a subplot that Coppola, uh, snipped.)

He essentially exists on a kind of grandiose, heroic scale, a man of excesses -- excesses of violence, of anger, of pride, of lust -- and dies in a suitably grandiose, excessive way.

Coppola was right on the mark, IMO.

I always laugh at the wedding scene when his wife is bragging about him while he goes off to cheat on her. IIRC the book has an entire subplot about how well endowed he is. 

But jokes aside, I agree, Caan played the role and scene correctly. It really doesn't last as long as it feels and you can argue why he stayed up for as long as he did was in part because being shot like that would push him back so he'd lean on the car. Tony Montana's death scene was way more comical IMO. Oh well, cocaine is a hell of a drug. 

Edited by Mr. Chatywin et al.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Ran said:

Sonny's death is  a moment of heightened reality to reflect the enormity of Sonny's assassination, and the larger-than-life nature of Sonny himself, although this aspect of things is much more explicit in the novel. James Caan was an average-sized guy, while Sonny Corleone in the novel is a massive hulk of a man, not especially tall (just short of 6') but built like a bull (also, hung like one, but that's a subplot that Coppola, uh, snipped.)

He essentially exists on a kind of grandiose, heroic scale, a man of excesses -- excesses of violence, of anger, of pride, of lust -- and dies in a suitably grandiose, excessive way.

Coppola was right on the mark, IMO.

I’ve not read the book so that may be a fair representation.  I know that Coppola credited Puzzo due to how true to the book the script ended up being. 
 

I went into the viewing under the best circumstances I could - uninterrupted, unedited and in a hotel with no outside distractions.  It just wasn’t to my taste. That’s true of the majority of Coppola’s work. Apocalypse Now, which I quite like, is not going to pull me in spontaneously. 
 

I suppose it’s also possible that I just don’t like mob movies to the extent that I’ve never seen Casino or Goodfella’s in a single sitting and what I have seen doesn’t inspire me to.  The Departed was OK. Carlito’s Way left me cold. Scarface was over the top.  However, I’m a huge fan of Peaky Blinders, so it’s not that clear cut. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...